Earnest Cassell Woods Ii v. Darrell Adams

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS II,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DARRELL ADAMS; MAURICE
JUNIOUS; NICHOLS; MERAZ;
PHILLIPS; MORA; WILLIAM
MCGUINNESS; ELEANOR
SANDOVAL,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-16335
D.C. No.
1:13-cv-00621-AWI-DLB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted September 14, 2017
San Francisco, California
Before: KOZINSKI and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and ARTERTON,**
District Judge.
FILED
OCT 06 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The Honorable Janet Bond Arterton, United States District Judge for
the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.

-- 1 of 2 --

page 2
1. The district court didn’t err by finding that Woods failed to show
“imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This case is
unlike Williams v. Paramo, where the prisoner alleged actual threats of violence.
See 775 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2015).
2. We grant Woods’s first three motions for judicial notice and deny his
fourth motion for judicial notice. Fed. R. Evid. 201(b).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --