Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-16035•JIHAD ABDUL MOHAMMED, AKA Jihad Mohammed-Bey v. JIMMY CRUZEN, Correctional Officer;
17-16035Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit20.12.2017
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JIHAD ABDUL MOHAMMED, AKA Jihad
Mohammed-Bey,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JIMMY CRUZEN, Correctional Officer; et
al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-16035
D.C. No. 5:15-cv-01891-LHK
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Lucy H. Koh, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 18, 2017**
Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Jihad Abdul Mohammed, AKA Jihad Mohammed-
Bey, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment for failure to
exhaust administrative remedies in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action related to
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
DEC 20 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 2 --
2 17-16035
congregational prayer. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review
de novo. Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2015). We affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment because Mohammed
failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether he properly
exhausted his administrative remedies, or whether there was “something in his
particular case that made the existing and generally available administrative
remedies effectively unavailable to him.” Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1172
(9th Cir. 2014) (en banc); see also Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 90 (2006)
(requiring proper exhaustion, which means “using all steps that the agency holds
out, and doing so properly (so that the agency addresses the issues on the merits)”
(emphasis, citation, and internal quotation marks omitted)). Mohammed contends
that he exhausted under a “continuing violation” theory, but even if this court were
to adopt such a theory, it would not apply in this case.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.