Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-16923•David Steckbeck; Steven Alba; Robert Bledsoe v. Bartenders Union Local 165
16-16923Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17.01.2018
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAVID STECKBECK; STEVEN ALBA;
ROBERT BLEDSOE,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
BARTENDERS UNION LOCAL 165,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-16923
D.C. No.
2:14-cv-00323-RFB-CWH
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Richard F. Boulware II, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 6, 2017 **
San Francisco, California
Before: SCHROEDER and GOULD ***
, Circuit Judges, and ELLIS, **** District
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
*** This case was submitted to a panel that included Judge Kozinski, who
recently retired. Following Judge Kozinski’s retirement, Judge Gould was drawn
by lot to replace him. Ninth Circuit General Order 3.2.h. Judge Gould has read the
briefs and reviewed the record.
**** The Honorable Sara Lee Ellis, United States District Judge for the
Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.
FILED
JAN 17 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Judge.
In order to prevail, appellants must show that the union’s “conduct in
dismissing their grievance was arbitrary, discriminatory or in bad faith.” Stevens
v. Moore Business Forms, Inc., 18 F.3d 1443, 1447 (9th Cir. 1994). Such a
decision by the union “is arbitrary only if it lacks a rational basis.” Id. Local 165’s
decision not to investigate appellants’ grievance was rational because the grievance
stemmed from facts Local 165 already knew. The union had an ample basis for
assessing appellants’ grievance and simply chose not to “brood over it.” Peters v.
Burlington N. R.R. Co., 931 F.2d 534, 540 (9th Cir. 1990), as amended on denial
of reh’g (Apr. 23, 1991). Appellants have also not offered any evidence of bad
faith on the part of Local 165. See Stevens, 18 F.3d at 1448.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.