Steve Klein; v. CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH and DOES, 1 through 10

16-56309Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27.08.2018

Gesamter Gesetzestext

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEVE KLEIN; et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH and DOES, 1
through 10,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-56309
D.C. No.
8:08-cv-01369-JLS-MLG
ORDER*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 6, 2018**
Pasadena, California
Before: W. FLETCHER and OWENS, Circuit Judges***.
Appellant’s motion to dismiss the petition for review, Dkt # 38, is
GRANTED. Accordingly, the memorandum disposition, Klein v. City of Laguna
Beach, 710 F. App’x 766 (9th Cir. 2018) (unpublished), is VACATED.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
*** Judge Reinhardt was on the original panel. The motion for voluntary
dismissal was voted upon only by Judges Fletcher and Owens.
FILED
AUG 27 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2
The filing of this order shall serve as the court’s mandate.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.