Carlos Almeida v. CLARK E. DUCART, Warden

17-16302Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit12.06.2019

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CARLOS ALMEIDA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CLARK E. DUCART, Warden; R. BELL,
Assistant Warden; D. GONGORA; J.
BEESON, Special Agent; R. BURT,
Special Agent; B. NEAL, Counselor,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-16302
D.C. No. 3:16-cv-02689-JD
Northern District of California,
San Francisco
ORDER
Before: GRABER and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and ARTERTON,* District Judge.
The mandate issued on May 16, 2019 is recalled, and the panel issues the
following changes to the memorandum disposition filed April 24, 2019:
Page 1, lines 1–2, replacing “pro se federal habeas petition” with “Section
1983 complaint”
Page 2, line 3, replacing “petition” with “complaint”
No further motions will be entertained in this case, and the mandate will be
reissued forthwith. The petition for panel rehearing, filed June 6, 2019, is
DENIED.
FILED
JUN 12 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* The Honorable Janet Bond Arterton, United States District Judge for
the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.

-- 1 of 1 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.