Luis Angel Mancillas Silva v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LUIS ANGEL MANCILLAS SILVA,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 15-70041
Agency No. A099-305-710
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 11, 2019**
Before: WALLACE, CANBY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Luis Angel Mancillas Silva, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
from an immigration judge’s decision denying cancellation of removal and
adjustment of status. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to consider Mancillas Silva’s contentions regarding
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
DEC 16 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 15-70041
whether his convictions render him ineligible for cancellation of removal and
adjustment of status as addressed in the BIA’s December 20, 2010, order, where
this petition for review is not timely as to that order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1)
(“The petition for review must be filed not later than 30 days after the date of the
final order of removal.”); Pinto v. Holder, 648 F.3d 976, 986 (9th Cir. 2011) (a
BIA order denying relief from removal, but remanding for voluntary departure
proceedings, is a final order of removal); Rizo v. Lynch, 810 F.3d 688, 691 (9th
Cir. 2016) (clarifying that Abdisalan v. Holder, 774 F.3d 517 (9th Cir. 2014), does
not disrupt the Pinto line of cases).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --