Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
13-70415•United States v. 2020-11-04 | 13-70415 | QUAN JIN V. WILLIAM BARR | nonprecedential | memorandum disposition |
13-70415Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit04.11.2020
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
QUAN BIN JIN,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 13-70415
Agency No. A087-957-040
ORDER
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 11, 2018
*
Honolulu, Hawaii
Before: WARDLAW, BERZON, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
The panel has voted to grant Jin’s petition for panel rehearing in light of this
court’s en banc decision in Torres v. Barr, No. 13-70653, 2020 WL 5668478 (9th
Cir. Sept. 24, 2020) (en banc) (overruling Minto v. Sessions, 854 F.3d 619 (9th Cir.
2017)). The prior memorandum disposition (Dkt. 65) in this case is vacated. Jin’s
petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot.
*
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
NOV 4 2020
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2
Jin’s petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals is
remanded to the agency to determine in the first instance whether alternative
grounds for removability exist under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6).
The petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED and the case is
REMANDED for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order.
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.