Linda M. Alexander; Live Victoriously Ministries v. CITY OF RICHLAND, A Municipal Corporation

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LINDA M. ALEXANDER; LIVE
VICTORIOUSLY MINISTRIES,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF RICHLAND, A Municipal
Corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 22-36019
D.C. No. 4:22-cv-05110-TOR
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Washington
Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 12, 2023**
Before: WALLACE, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Linda M. Alexander appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing her action alleging various federal and state law claims. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
DEC 18 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 22-36019
Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Cervantes v. United States, 330 F.3d 1186, 1187
(9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Alexander’s action because Alexander
failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556
U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (to avoid dismissal, “a complaint must contain sufficient
factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its
face” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).
All pending requests are denied.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --