Alex Meruelo; Liset Meruelo v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

The Honorable Roger T. Benitez, District Judge for the U.S. District *
Court for Southern California, sitting by designation.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALEX MERUELO; LISET MERUELO,
Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE,
Respondent-Appellee.
No. 11-70015
Tax Ct. No.
624-04
ORDER
Filed November 14, 2012
Before: M. Margaret McKeown and N. Randy Smith,
Circuit Judges, and Roger T. Benitez, District Judge.*
ORDER
The Opinion filed on August 16, 2012, slip op. 9401, and
appearing at 691 F.3d 1108, is amended as follows:
At slip op. 9419, line 8, please replace the sentence that
currently states, <Lastly, even if we were to hold that the
NOD must have been “accepted as filed,” and such a
determination is a factual inquiry, the Meruelos’ argument

-- 1 of 2 --

MERUELO V. CIR 2
still fails,> with the following sentence: <Lastly, even if we
were to hold that the partnership return must have been
“accepted as filed,” and such a determination is a factual
inquiry, the Meruelos’ argument still fails.>
With this amendment the panel has voted unanimously to
deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge McKeown and
Judge N.R. Smith have voted to deny the petition for
rehearing en banc, and Judge Benitez has so recommended.
The full court has been advised of the petition for
rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on
whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en
banc are DENIED.
No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc
may be filed in response to the amended opinion.

-- 2 of 2 --