Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-56406•Glenn Tibble v. Edison International
10-56406Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit05.08.2016
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GLENN TIBBLE; WILLIAM BAUER;
WILLIAM IZRAL; HENRY
RUNOWIECKI; FREDERICK
SUHADOLC; HUGH TINMAN, JR., as
representatives of a class of similarly
situated persons, and on behalf of the
Plan,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
EDISON INTERNATIONAL; THE
EDISON INTERNATIONAL BENEFITS
COMMITTEE, FKA The Southern
California Edison Benefits
Committee; EDISON INTERNATIONAL
TRUST INVESTMENT COMMITTEE;
SECRETARY OF THE EDISON
INTERNATIONAL BENEFITS
COMMITTEE; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON’S VICE PRESIDENT OF
HUMAN RESOURCES; MANAGER OF
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON’S
HR SERVICE CENTER,
Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 10-56406
10-56415
D.C. No.
2:07-cv-05359-
SVW-AGR
ORDER
Filed August 5, 2016
-- 1 of 2 --
TIBBLE V. EDISON INT’L 2
ORDER
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges,
it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule
35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judges Bybee, Ikuta and Owens did not participate in the
deliberations or vote in this case.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.