Dinwoodie v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Per Curiam.
We have fully considered the plaintiffs’ claims and have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs as well as the record of the case. We fail to recognize how the matters of American Motorists Ins. Co. v. Gould, 213 Conn. 625, 569 A.2d 1105 (1990), and Cov*937enant Ins. Co. v. Coon, 220 Conn. 30, 594 A.2d 977 (1991), are distinguishable, and accordingly find that they control the present case.

The judgment is affirmed.