2025-2202•Thomas Juante Burdine v. State of Florida
Gesamter Gesetzestext
FIFTH D ISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL S TATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D2025-2202 L.T. Case No. 16-2025-MM-2843-A CORRECTED _____________________________ T HOMAS JUANTE B URDINE , Appellant, v. S TATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the County Court for Duval County. Mose Levon Floyd, Judge. Charlie Cofer, Public Defender, and Elizabeth Hogan Webb, Assistant Public Defender, Jacksonville, for Appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Darcy Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. October 16, 2026 P ER C URIAM. In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence. However, we remand for entry of a corrected judgment striking the $50 cost of investigation as the cost of investigation 1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
2 was not orally pronounced at sentencing. See Rogers v. State, 289 So. 3d 548, 549–50 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (reversing with directions to correct an order to remove investigative costs that were not orally pronounced). A FFIRMED; and R EMANDED with instructions. MAKAR , SOUD, and MAC IVER , JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA Case No. 5D2025-2202 L.T. Case No. 16-2025-MM-2843-A CORRECTED THOMAS JUANTE BURDINE, Appellant, V. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the County Court for Duval County. Mose Levon Floyd, Judge. Charlie Cofer, Public Defender, and Elizabeth Hogan Webb, Assistant Public Defender, Jacksonville, for Appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Darcy Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. October 16, 2026 PER CURIAM. In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Appellant's judgment and sentence. However, we remand for entry of a corrected judgment striking the $50 cost of investigation as the cost of investigation 1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). was not orally pronounced at sentencing. See Rogers v. State, 289 So. 3d 548, 549-50 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (reversing with directions to correct an order to remove investigative costs that were not orally pronounced). AFFIRMED; and REMANDED with instructions. MAKAR, SOUD, and MACIVER, JJ., concur. Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.