Alloy Lewin v. State of Florida

2026-0432Fladistctapp4

Originalquelle öffnen

Gesamter Gesetzestext

D ISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL O F T HE STATE OF F LORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
ALLOY LEWIN,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D2026-0432
[October 14, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward 	County; 	Lorena 	V. 	Mastrarrigo, 	Judge; 	L.T. 	Case 	No.
062000CF005384A88810.
Alloy Lewin, Cross City, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
P ER CURIAM .
We affirm the trial court’s order dismissing appellant’s petition for writ
of habeas corpus. 	See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). 	The
petition 	is 	unauthorized 	and 	frivolous. 	Appellant 	is 	cautioned 	that
abusive, 	repetitive, 	malicious, 	and/or 	frivolous 	filing 	may 	result 	in
sanctions, such as a bar on pro se filing in this court or referral to prison
officials for disciplinary procedures, which may include forfeiture of gain
time. 	See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999); § 944.279(1), Fla.
Stat. (2025).
Affirmed.
F ORST , S HEPHERD and LOTT , JJ., concur.
* 	* 	*
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative

# DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

ALLOY LEWIN,
Appellant,

V.

STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.

No. 4D2026-0432
[October 14, 2026]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Lorena V. Mastrarrigo, Judge; L.T. Case No.
062000CF005384A88810.

Alloy Lewin, Cross City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's order dismissing appellant's petition for writ
of habeas corpus. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). The
petition is unauthorized and frivolous. Appellant is cautioned that
abusive, repetitive, malicious, and/or frivolous filing may result in
sanctions, such as a bar on pro se filing in this court or referral to prison
officials for disciplinary procedures, which may include forfeiture of gain
time. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999); § 944.279(1), Fla.
Stat. (2025).

Affirmed.

FORST, SHEPHERD and LOTT, JJ., concur.

\*
\*
\*

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.