CourtListener 10861734•Wilson Francois v. State of Florida
Wilson Francois v. State of Florida
CourtListener 10861734Fladistctapp20.05.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed May 20, 2026.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-1526
Lower Tribunal No. F21-6451
________________
Wilson Francois,
Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura
Shearon Cruz, Judge.
Law Offices of Philip R. Horowitz, and Philip R. Horowitz, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Jason Michael Ross,
Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, C.J., and LOGUE and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The standard of review for a lower court’s denial of a motion to
withdraw a plea is abuse of discretion. See Coley v. State, 350 So. 3d 168,
168 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022). Moreover, “[w]here (as here) [a motion to withdraw
a plea] is filed after sentence has been imposed, the defendant bears the
burden of establishing that a ‘manifest injustice has occurred.’” Toomer v.
State, 410 So. 3d 709, 712 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025) (quoting Williams v. State,
919 So. 2d 645, 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)). Nothing in this record indicates
the trial court abused its discretion in denying Appellant’s motion to withdraw
his plea considering the extensive colloquy conducted by the trial court when
it accepted the Appellant’s plea.
Affirmed.
2
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.