CourtListener 10874256•Michael Gibson v. Joseph Daniels
Gesamter Gesetzestext
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 6D2025-0752
Lower Tribunal No. 2023-CA-008516
_____________________________
MICHAEL GIBSON,
Appellant,
v.
JOSEPH DANIELS,
Appellee.
_____________________________
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.
Heather Pinder Rodriguez, Judge.
June 12, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See, e.g., Portner v. Koppel, 382 So. 3d 742, 747 (Fla. 4th DCA
2024) (“Competent substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding that
appellant’s former counsel had clear and unequivocal authority from appellant to
settle the case . . . .”); Albert v. Am. Fam. Ins. Co., 739 F. App’x 607, 610 n.2 (11th
Cir. 2018) (“In deciding a motion to enforce a settlement agreement (as with a
motion for summary judgment) a court may consider the documents, affidavits,
depositions and other evidence in the record to determine whether a genuine issue
of material fact exists.” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)).
MIZE, BROWNLEE and PRATT, JJ., concur.
David L. Perkins and John B. Agnetti, of Hoffman, Larin & Agnetti, P.A., North
Miami Beach, for Appellant.
Megan G. Colter and Thomas A. Valdez, of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A.,
Tampa, and Kathleen MacMillan and Stevie Baker, of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood &
Boyer, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
2
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.