Herndon v. Experian; Experian Info Sol Inc

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA
HEATHER HERNDON,
Plaintiff,
v.
EXPERIAN, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 3:22-cv-00165-SLG
ORDER RE EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Before the Court at Docket 86 is Experian Information Solutions, Inc.’s
Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff Herndon did not file a response to the
motion and Experian filed an additional brief in support of the motion at Docket 90.
On the current record, no evidence exists to demonstrate a genuine issue
for trial on any claim that Plaintiff’s claim could be construed to assert against
Experian. Further, Experian has demonstrated that it is entitled to judgment as a
matter of law. 	Accordingly, Experian is entitled to summary judgment in its favor
and its motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 1
Plaintiff did file a Petition for Name Change at Docket 89, seeking to have
her name not appear in all capitals in the case caption. 	The request is DENIED
1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a); Celotex Corp. v. Catreet, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986).
Case 3:22-cv-00165-SLG Document 93 Filed 11/16/23 Page 1 of 2

Case No. 3:22-cv-00165-SLG, Herndon v. Experian, et al.
Order re Experian Information Solutions, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment
Page 2 of 2
because it is inconsistent with the Local Civil Rules for the District of Alaska. See
Local Civil Rule 7.5 Exemplar.
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a final judgment accordingly.
DATED this 16th day of November, 2023, at Anchorage, Alaska.
/s/ Sharon L. Gleason
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:22-cv-00165-SLG Document 93 Filed 11/16/23 Page 2 of 2