LaGreca v. Davis et al

2:25-cv-00192Ared23.10.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DELTA DIVISION
VERSACE POOH LAGRECA 	PLAINTIFF
ADC #103829
v. 	No: 2:25-cv-00192-JM
BRANDON A. DAVIS; and
MICHAEL MELLOW 	DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendation (RD) submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. Mr. LaGreca did not file any objections to the
RD. He did file an amended complaint (Doc. No. 4), but this amendment did not address the
issues raised in the RD. He also filed a request for copies. (Doc. No. 5).
After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and
Recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this
Court’s findings in all respects. His request for copies will be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. 	LaGreca’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 1) is
DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
2. 	His motion for copies (Doc. No. 5) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to mail
Mr. LaGreca copies of the following: the docket sheet in this case as well Doc. No. 4; in 1:11-cv-
00053-JLH (Waller v. Maples et al.), Doc. Nos. 20, 22-23; and in 5:19-cv-00181-KGB (Waller
v. Felts et al.), Doc. Nos. 5-6.
DATED this 23rd day of October, 2025.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:25-cv-00192-JM Document 6 Filed 10/23/25 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.