2:25-cv-00192•LaGreca v. Davis et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DELTA DIVISION VERSACE POOH LAGRECA PLAINTIFF ADC #103829 v. No: 2:25-cv-00192-JM BRANDON A. DAVIS; and MICHAEL MELLOW DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendation (RD) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. Mr. LaGreca did not file any objections to the RD. He did file an amended complaint (Doc. No. 4), but this amendment did not address the issues raised in the RD. He also filed a request for copies. (Doc. No. 5). After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. His request for copies will be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. LaGreca’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2. His motion for copies (Doc. No. 5) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to mail Mr. LaGreca copies of the following: the docket sheet in this case as well Doc. No. 4; in 1:11-cv- 00053-JLH (Waller v. Maples et al.), Doc. Nos. 20, 22-23; and in 5:19-cv-00181-KGB (Waller v. Felts et al.), Doc. Nos. 5-6. DATED this 23rd day of October, 2025. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 2:25-cv-00192-JM Document 6 Filed 10/23/25 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.