4:25-cv-00438•Brown v. Watkins et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION TYLER BROWN PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 4:25-cv-00438-JM WATKINS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Tyler Brown (“Plaintiff”) has not responded to the Court’s July 9, 2025, Order directing him to file an Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 5). The Court warned Plaintiff that his failure to do so could result in the dismissal of his Complaint without prejudice. (Id.). Rule 5.5(c)(2) of the Local Rules of the United States District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas provides as follows: It is the duty of any party not represented by counsel to promptly notify the Clerk and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his or her address, to monitor the progress of the case and to prosecute or defend the action diligently . . . . If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. . . . Because Plaintiff has failed to respond, his Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal is considered frivolous and not in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of October, 2025. _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 4:25-cv-00438-JM Document 6 Filed 10/29/25 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:25-cv-00438-JM Document 6 Filed 10/29/25 Page 2 of 2
1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
Case 4:25-cv-00438-JM Document6- Filed 10/29/25 Page 1of2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION TYLER BROWN PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 4:25-cv-00438-JM WATKINS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Tyler Brown (“Plaintiff”) has not responded to the Court’s July 9, 2025, Order directing him to file an Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 5). The Court warned Plaintiff that his failure to do so could result in the dismissal of his Complaint without prejudice. (/d.). Rule 5.5(c)(2) of the Local Rules of the United States District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas provides as follows: It is the duty of any party not represented by counsel to promptly notify the Clerk and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his or her address, to monitor the progress of the case and to prosecute or defend the action diligently . . . . If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. .. . Because Plaintiff has failed to respond, his Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal is considered frivolous and not in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 29" day of October, 2025. CO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO Case 4:25-cv-00438-JM Document6- Filed 10/29/25 Page 2 of 2
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.