Villanueva-Rollo v. Noem et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Sandra Patricia Villanueva-Rollo,
Petitioner,
v.
Kristi Noem, et al.,
Respondents.
No. CV-25-04667-PHX-KML (JZB)
ORDER
In their response to the order to show cause, “Respondents acknowledge that
Petitioner’s claim in this action as to his entitlement to a bond hearing appears to be subject
to the Bautista judgment and to any applicable appellate proceedings relating to it.” (Doc.
8 at 1 (citing Bautista v. Santacruz, No. 5:25-CV-01873-SSS-BFM, Doc. 94 (C.D. Cal.
Dec. 18, 2025)).) In effect, respondents concede petitioner is entitled to a bond hearing.
Respondents request the court “extend the deadline to conduct the [bond] hearing to
account for the upcoming closure of the Immigration Court.” (Doc. 8 at 2.)
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Case 2:25-cv-04667-KML--JZB Document 10 Filed 12/23/25 Page 1 of 2

- 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is GRANTED
to the extent respondents shall either immediately release petitioner or provide her with a
bond hearing within ten days of this order. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor
of petitioner and close this case.
Dated this 23rd day of December, 2025.
Case 2:25-cv-04667-KML--JZB Document 10 Filed 12/23/25 Page 2 of 2