2:26-cv-04291•Logan v. City of Mesa Police Department et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Robert Logan, Plaintiff, v. City of Mesa Police Department, et al., Defendants. No. CV-26-04291-PHX-KML ORDER On June 25, 2026, defendant City of Mesa answered plaintiff’s complaint. (Doc. 9.) On October 8, 2026, the City filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s state-law claims. The city identified its motion as brought “[p]ursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).” (Doc. 25.) “A Rule 12(b)(6) motion must be made before the responsive pleading.” Elvig v. Calvin Presbyterian Church, 375 F.3d 951, 954 (9th Cir. 2004). The City’s motion is procedurally improper, and it is denied. The City may renew its arguments regarding plaintiff’s state-law claims in a motion for summary judgment after the conclusion of discovery. IT IS ORDERED the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 25) is DENIED. Dated this 9th day of October, 2026. Case 2:26-cv-04291-KML Document 27 Filed 10/09/26 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.