Reeve v. Synchrony Bank, et al.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WILLIAM REEVE,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
SYNCHRONY BANK, et al.,
Defendant(s).
No. 1:24-cv-01458-JLT-EPG
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE AND SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE PROCEDURES
The Court sets a settlement conference for November 9, 2026, at 1:00 p.m., Courtroom
10, before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. The conference will be held remotely by Zoom.
Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case
shall appear (via Zoom) at the Settlement Conference. It is recommended that pertinent evidence
to be offered at trial, documents or otherwise, be submitted with the settlement conference brief
for presentation to the settlement judge. Neither the settlement conference statements nor
communications during the settlement conference with the settlement judge can be used by either
party in the trial of this case.
Absent permission from the Court, in addition to counsel who will try the case being
present (via Zoom), the individual parties shall also be present (via Zoom). In the case of
corporate parties, associations or other entities, and insurance carriers, a representative executive
with authority to discuss, consider, propose and agree, or disagree, to any settlement proposal or
offer shall also be present (via Zoom).
Case 1:24-cv-01458-JLT-EPG Document 106 Filed 10/14/26 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 2
Parties are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present (via Zoom)
at the Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. The
individual with full authority to settle must also have "unfettered discretion and authority" to
change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. The purpose behind requiring the
attendance of a person with full settlement authority is that the parties' view of the case may be
altered during the face to face conference. An authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or
sum certain can be found not to comply with the requirement of full authority to settle.
IF ANY PARTY BELIEVES THAT A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD
BE FUTILE, THEN THAT PARTY SHALL CONTACT THE COURT NOT LATER
THAN SEVENTY-TWO HOURS PRECEDING THE SCHEDULED SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE.
Confidential Settlement Statements
At least five (5) court days prior to the settlement conference, each party shall submit a
Confidential Settlement Conference Statement in Word format directly to Judge Grosjean’s
Chambers at epgorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The statement shall not be filed on the docket or
served on any other party. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date
and time of the settlement conference clearly noted on the first page. The Confidential Settlement
Conference Statement shall include the following:
A. A brief statement of the facts of the case.
B. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds
upon which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties'
likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major
issues in dispute.
C. A summary of the proceedings to date.
D. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial
and trial.
E. The relief sought.
F. The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a
Case 1:24-cv-01458-JLT-EPG Document 106 Filed 10/14/26 Page 2 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 3
history of past settlement discussions, offers and demands.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 	October 14, 2026 	/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case 1:24-cv-01458-JLT-EPG Document 106 Filed 10/14/26 Page 3 of 3