(HC)Maksim v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility et al

1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Petitioner is an immigration detainee proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
On October 9, 2025, the Court granted the petition and directed Respondent to provide
Petitioner with a bond hearing before an immigration judge. (Doc. 12.) On November 25, 2025,
Petitioner filed a motion to enforce judgment. (Doc. 14.) Petitioner contends that Respondent failed to
provide him with a bond hearing in accordance with the Court’s order. On November 26, 2025,
Respondent filed a response to Petitioner’s motion. (Doc. 15.) Respondent submits that Petitioner was
provided a bond hearing on November 14, 2025.
The Court has reviewed Petitioner’s motion and Respondent’s response. According to
Respondent’s exhibits, Petitioner was provided a bond hearing on November 14, 2025. (Doc. 15-1 at
3.) The Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denied Petitioner release finding that Petitioner poses a substantial
HAKOBKOKHVYAN MAKSIM,
Petitioner,
v.
WARDEN, GOLDEN STATE ANNEX, et al.,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:25-cv-00955-SKO (HC)
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO
ENFORCE JUDGMENT AS MOOT
Case 1:25-cv-00955-SKO Document 17 Filed 12/01/25 Page 1 of 2

2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
risk of flight. The IJ applied the correct standard and cited numerous reasons in support of his
decision. As Respondent correct notes, Petitioner has been granted relief as ordered by the Court.
Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion to enforce judgment is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 1, 2025 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case 1:25-cv-00955-SKO Document 17 Filed 12/01/25 Page 2 of 2