1:25-cv-01001•(SS) Flores v. Commissioner of Social Security
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JESUS FLORES, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Case No. 1:25-cv-01001-SAB ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT’S RESPONSIVE BRIEF (ECF No. 11) Before the Court is the parties’ stipulation for an extension of time in which Defendant may file a responsive brief in support of his position of whether the Court should affirm, reverse, or modify a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff’s application for Social Security benefits. 42 U.S.C. 405(g). For good cause shown, the Court approves the stipulation and ORDERS that Defendant shall have through December 12, 2025, to file a responsive brief. The scheduling order (ECF No. 5) otherwise remains controlling. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 6, 2025 STANLEY A. BOONE United States Magistrate Judge Case 1:25-cv-01001-KES-SAB Document 12 Filed 11/06/25 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.