(SS) Flores v. Commissioner of Social Security

1:25-cv-01001Caed06.11.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JESUS FLORES,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
Case No. 1:25-cv-01001-SAB
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSIVE BRIEF
(ECF No. 11)
Before the Court is the parties’ stipulation for an extension of time in which Defendant
may file a responsive brief in support of his position of whether the Court should affirm,
reverse, or modify a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff’s
application for Social Security benefits. 42 U.S.C. 405(g). For good cause shown, the Court
approves the stipulation and ORDERS that Defendant shall have through December 12, 2025,
to file a responsive brief. The scheduling order (ECF No. 5) otherwise remains controlling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 6, 2025
STANLEY A. BOONE
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 1:25-cv-01001-KES-SAB Document 12 Filed 11/06/25 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.