USA v. Nolan

2:25-cr-00166Caed02.12.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

-1-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States v. Nolan.
25-CR-166-DJC
Stipulation and Order to Continue Status
Conference and Exclude Time
Kyle R. Knapp, SBN 166597
Attorney at Law
916 2nd Street
2nd Floor
Sacramento, CA 916814
916-441-4717
Fax:916-441-4299
kyleknapp@sbcglobal.net
Attorney for Defendant
Sonny Nolan
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SONNY NOLAN,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 25-CR-166-DJC
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE
STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDE TIME
Date: 	December 4, 2025
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Judge: Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between United States Attorney Eric
Grant, through Assistant United States Attorney, Alex Cardenas, counsel for Plaintiff and Kyle
Knapp, counsel for Sonny Nolan that the status hearing currently set for December 4, 2025, at
9:00 be continued to January 15, 2026, at 9:00 a.m.
The parties specifically stipulate as follows:
1. 	By previous order, this matter was set for a status on December 4, 2025, at 9:00
a.m.
2. 	By stipulation, Mr. Nolan now moves to continue the status conference to January
15, 2026, at 9:00 a.m.
3. 	Counsel for the defendant was recently appointed and a thumb drive containing
the discovery in this matter was produced on October 15, 2025.
4. 	Mr. Nolan requires additional time to review the discovery, investigate and
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States v. Nolan.
25-CR-166-DJC
Stipulation and Order to Continue Status
Conference and Exclude Time
research possible defenses, research potential pretrial motions, and explore
potential resolutions to the case, and otherwise prepare for trial.
5. 	Mr. Nolan believes that failure to grant the requested continuance would deny
them the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account
the exercise of due diligence.
6. 	The government does not object to the requested continuance.
7. 	For the purpose of computing time under 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq. (Speedy Trial
Act), the parties request that the time period between December 4, 2025 and
January 15, 2026, inclusive, be deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) (Local Code T4), because it would result from a continuance
granted by the Court at the defense’s request, based on a finding that the ends of
justice served by granting the continuance outweighs the best interest of the
public and Mr. Nolan in a speedy trial.
Respectfully submitted,
Date: December 1, 2025 	/s/ Kyle Knapp
Kyle Knapp
Attorney for Mr. Nolan
//
Date: December 1, 2025 	ERIC GRANT
United States Attorney
/s/ Alex Cardenas
Alex Cardenas
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Plaintiff
-3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States v. Nolan.
25-CR-166-DJC
Stipulation and Order to Continue Status
Conference and Exclude Time
O R D E R
The Court, having received and considered the parties’ stipulation, and good cause
appearing therefrom, adopts the parties’ stipulation in its entirety as its order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 1, 2025 	/s/ Daniel J. Calabretta
THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.