In re: McKinsey & Co., Inc. National Prescription Opiate Consultant Litigation

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PAGE LIMITS
CASE NO. 3:21-MD-2996-CRB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STEPHEN P. NEW
steve@newlawoffice.com
STEPHEN NEW & ASSOCIATES
430 Harper Park Drive
Beckley, West Virginia 25801
Telephone: (304) 250-6017
Counsel for Plaintiff Cynthia Woolwine
JAMES L. BERNARD (pro hac vice)
james.bernard@hoganlovells.com
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
390 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10017
Telephone: (212) 918-3000
MARK DAVID McPHERSON (SBN 307951)
mmcpherson@goodwinlaw.com
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
The New York Times Building
620 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Telephone: (212) 813-8800
REBECCA L. TARNEJA (SBN 293461)
rtarneja@goodwinlaw.com
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
601 South Figueroa Street, Suite 4100
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: (213) 426-2500
Counsel for Defendant McKinsey & Company,
Inc., United States
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IN RE: McKINSEY & CO., INC.
NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE
CONSULTANT LITIGATION
This document relates to:
NAS ACTIONS
Case No. 3:21-md-2996-CRB (SK)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE: PAGE LIMITS
Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer
Courtroom: 6, 17th Floor
Case 3:21-md-02996-CRB Document 939 Filed 06/23/26 Page 1 of 4

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PAGE LIMITS
CASE NO. 3:21-MD-2996-CRB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION
WHEREAS, on May 21, 2026, plaintiff Cynthia Woolwine (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion for
Sanctions For Spoliation of Evidence against Defendant McKinsey & Company, Inc. (the
“Spoliation Motion”) (ECF 926);
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ Spoliation Motion is approximately twenty-five pages, excluding
signature pages and the Certificate of Service;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ Motion raises issues which McKinsey believes cannot be addressed
adequately in its opposition to the Spoliation Motion (“Opposition”) within the number of pages
contemplated by this Court’s standing order;
WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred about extending page limits given these
limitations;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree and stipulate to extending the page limit for
McKinsey’s Opposition to 30 pages.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: June 22, 2026 By: /s/ James L. Bernard
JAMES L. BERNARD (pro hac vice)
james.bernard@hoganlovells.com
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
390 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10017
Telephone: (212) 918-3000
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
MARK DAVID McPHERSON (SBN 307951)
mmcpherson@goodwinlaw.com
The New York Times Building
620 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Telephone: (212) 813-8800
Counsel for Defendant McKinsey & Company,
Inc., United States
Case 3:21-md-02996-CRB Document 939 Filed 06/23/26 Page 2 of 4

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PAGE LIMITS
CASE NO. 3:21-MD-2996-CRB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
By: /s/ Stephen P. New
STEPHEN P. NEW
steve@newlawoffice.com
STEPHEN NEW & ASSOCIATES
430 Harper Park Drive
Beckley, West Virginia 25801
Telephone: (304) 250-6017
Counsel for Plaintiff Cynthia Woolwine
ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all signatories listed, and on
whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.
By: /s/ James L. Bernard
JAMES L. BERNARD
HOGAN LVOELLS US LLP
Case 3:21-md-02996-CRB Document 939 Filed 06/23/26 Page 3 of 4

3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PAGE LIMITS
CASE NO. 3:21-MD-2996-CRB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
June 23, 2026
Case 3:21-md-02996-CRB Document 939 Filed 06/23/26 Page 4 of 4