Giuseppe Pampena v. Elon R.Musk

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GIUSEPPE PAMPENA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ELON MUSK,
Defendant.
Case No. 22-cv-05937-CRB
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE
SEALED
Plaintiffs filed an omnibus administrative motion to consider whether their motions
in limine and accompanying exhibits should be sealed or redacted. Dkt. 352. Plaintiffs
explained that they did not believe any of the information warranted sealing or redaction.
Id. at 5. None of the Designating Parties has filed a statement or declaration establishing
that the material should be sealed, as required by Civil Local Rule 79-5(f)(3).
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 26, 2026
CHARLES R. BREYER
United States District Judge
Case 3:22-cv-05937-CRB Document 356 Filed 01/26/26 Page 1 of 1