3:23-cv-04416•Sanders v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEPHEN (REX) SANDERS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, Defendant. Case No. 23-cv-04416-RFL SECOND PROPOSED FINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND RULINGS ON DISPUTED JURY INSTRUCTIONS Enclosed as Exhibits A and B are the Court’s second proposed final jury instructions and rulings on the parties’ disputed jury instructions following the conference on February 18, 2026. For the reasons provided in the attached rulings and articulated on the record on February 18, Defendant’s proposed amendments to the jury instructions in Dkt. Nos. 297 and 299 are denied. Plaintiffs have enumerated specific protected activities and adverse actions in their proposed instructions and have proffered additional protected activities and adverse actions (see Dkt. Nos. 293, 298). The Court reserves its ruling as to the final list of protected activities and adverse actions for the final charging conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 19, 2026 RITA F. LIN United States District Judge Case 3:23-cv-04416-RFL Document 310 Filed 02/19/26 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.