Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd. v. Micron Technology, Inc., et al

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
YANGTZE MEMORY TECHNOLOGIES
COMPANY, LTD.,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 23-cv-05792-RFL
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
SEAL AND MOTION TO CONSIDER
WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S
MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Re: Dkt. Nos. 254, 255, 266
After considering Plaintiff YMTC’s motion to seal (Dkt. No. 254) and motions to
consider whether another party’s materials should be sealed (Dkt. Nos. 255, 266), the Court
GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to seal and first motion to consider whether another party’s
materials should be sealed (Dkt. No. 255) and HEREBY seals the following:
1. Exhibits 1, 2, 3,4,5, 6, and 16 to the Motion to Partially Lift Stay (Dkt. Nos. 254-3,
254-4, 254-5, 254-6. 254-7, 254-8, 254-9, 255-2, 255-3, 255-4, 255-5, 255-6. 255-7,
255-8).
As to these motions, Local Rule 79-5(c)(1) is satisfied. Compelling reasons support the
sealing of the above records, as the records contain confidential, proprietary information, and
Defendant Micron has a privacy interest in the information.
However, as to YMTC’s second motion to consider whether another party’s materials
should be sealed (Dkt. No. 266), the document Micron seeks to seal does not appear to contain a
discussion of Micron’s proprietary technology. Accordingly, Micron is ORDERED TO SHOW
Case 3:23-cv-05792-RFL Document 281 Filed 01/21/26 Page 1 of 2

2
CAUSE why the document should not be unsealed by January 28, 2026.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 21, 2026
RITA F. LIN
United States District Judge
Case 3:23-cv-05792-RFL Document 281 Filed 01/21/26 Page 2 of 2