3:26-cv-02232•McPhee v. Big Brand Tire & Service
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHRIS MCPHEE, etc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. BIG BRAND TIRE & SERVICE, et al., Defendants. Case No. 26-cv-02232-RS ORDER FOR FURTHER BRIEFING The hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss, presently set for October 15, 2026, is vacated. Within 10 days of the date of this order, plaintiffs shall submit a supplemental brief, not to exceed 12 pages, addressing Fons v. Grocery Outlet, Inc., 2026 WL 2876369 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 24, 2026). Plaintiffs shall also address the impact of the enactment of Senate Bill 690 on the claim under CIPA § 638.51. Within 7 days thereafter, defendants may submit a response, also not to exceed 12 pages. The motion will then be submitted for decision without argument, or reset for hearing, in the court’s discretion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 13, 2026 ______________________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge Case 3:26-cv-02232-RS Document 36 Filed 10/13/26 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.