3:26-cv-03136•Ng v. United Financial Casualty Company
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TAK LUN NG, Plaintiff, v. UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. 26-cv-03136-LJC ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 43 The Court issued an order of dismissal (ECF No. 41) and the Clerk entered judgment for Defendant (ECF No. 42) on September 28, 2026. Plaintiff has filed a “Reply” arguing that the Court’s Order was erroneous, which might also be intended as a motion for leave to amend, for reconsideration, or to alter or amend judgment. To the extent Plaintiff seeks such relief, it is DENIED for the reasons stated in the Court’s previous Order. To the extent Plaintiff’s filing purports to notice a hearing for October 15, 2026, that hearing is VACATED. The Court will not respond to any further motions challenging matters previously decided or seeking to reopen this closed case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 9, 2026 LISA J. CISNEROS United States Magistrate Judge Case 3:26-cv-03136-LJC Document 44 Filed 10/09/26 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.