Morris v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANTHONY MORRIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 23-cv-03277-HSG
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE
SEALED
Re: Dkt. No. 110
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to consider whether another party’s material
should be sealed. Dkt. No. 110 (discussing redactions in Dkt. No. 109 and 109-2). Defendants
state that the documents may be unsealed and filed publicly on the docket. Dkt. No. 112.
Accordingly, the Court DENIES the motion, Dkt. No. 110, and DIRECTS Plaintiff to file an
unredacted version of Dkt. No. 109 on the public docket within 7 days of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
2/12/2026
Case 4:23-cv-03277-HSG Document 165 Filed 02/12/26 Page 1 of 1