IntusCare, Inc. v. RTZ Associates, Inc.

4:24-cv-01132Cand08.04.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
INTUS CARE, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
RTZ ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 24-cv-01132-JST (AGT)
DISCOVERY ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 104
RTZ’s request to compel Intus to respond further to RFPs 91–97 and RFPs 99–113
is denied as untimely. The fact discovery cutoff was March 9, 2026. Dkt. 91 at 1. All dis-
covery-related disputes needed to be raised by March 16, 2026. See Civil L.R. 37-3.
RTZ filed its current request to compel on April 6, 2026. Dkt. 104. Before then, RTZ
had never flagged these RFPs or asked the Court to compel Intus to respond further to them.
RTZ waited too long to move to compel further responses.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 8, 2026
______________________________
Alex G. Tse
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 4:24-cv-01132-JST Document 107 Filed 04/08/26 Page 1 of 1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.