4:25-cv-08462•Singh et al v. Bondi et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California UNITED S TATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA H ARPREET S INGH, ET AL ., Plaintiffs, vs. PAM B ONDI , ET AL ., Defendants. Case No. 4:25-cv-08462-YGR O RDER DISMISSING CASE On December 17, 2025, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause as to why the petition should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 11). Plaintiffs were ordered to respond by no later than December 22, 2025, and were warned that failure to respond would result in the dismissal of this action. Plaintiff did not file a response. Pursuant to the Court’s December 17, 2025 order, this case is DISMISSED. The clerk shall close the action. I T I S S O O RDERED. Dated: February 20, 2026 YVONNE G ONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED S TATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Case 4:25-cv-08462-YGR Document 12 Filed 02/20/26 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.