Luster v. Stinson et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JUSTIN TYRELL LUSTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
GINAE STINSON, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 26-cv-09130-JST
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
On or about August 27, 2026, Plaintiff filed a pro se civil rights complaint with this Court,
ECF No. 1, and a state court request to waive court fees, ECF No. 2. That same day, the Court
informed Plaintiff that this action was deficient because he had not submitted the correct in forma
pauperis application. ECF No. 3. The Court ordered Plaintiff to submit a correct and complete in
forma pauperis application by September 24, 2026, and informed him that failure to comply with
this deadline would result in the action being dismissed without prejudice. ECF No. 3. The Court
sent Plaintiff a copy of the correct in forma pauperis application. ECF No. 3. The deadline has
passed and Plaintiff has neither filed a complete in forma pauperis applicationn or communicated
with the Court. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED for failure to file a complete in forma
pauperis application or, in the alternative, pay the full filing fee. The dismissal is without
prejudice to Plaintiff filing a motion to reopen the action. Any motion to reopen must be
accompanied by either the filing fee or a complete in forma pauperis application.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 14, 2026
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Case 4:26-cv-09130-JST Document 7 Filed 10/14/26 Page 1 of 1