Lyskoski et al v. Continental Mills, Inc.

Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-15-2019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff(s)
v.
Defendant(s)
CASE No C
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
 	Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
 	Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Court-sponsored mediation)
 	Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge (ADR L.R. 7)
 	Private ADR (specify process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
 	the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR)
 	other requested deadline:
Date:
Date:
Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorney for Defendant
 IT IS SO ORDERED.
 IT IS SO ORDERED WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS:
DATE:
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order
Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Early
Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.”
CARLIE LYSKOSKI et al,
CONTINENTAL MILLS, INC.,
2:25-CV-06291-NW
n
n	prior to 9/30/2026 deadline
02/17/2026	s/ Craig W. Straub
02/19/2026	/s/ Jacob Harper
February 20, 2026
Case 5:25-cv-06291-NW Document 34 Filed 02/20/26 Page 1 of 1