3:24-cv-00260•RUIZ v. ALDRIDGE
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION JULIO RODRIGUEZ RUIZ, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:24-cv-260-TKW-ZCB BEAU ANTHONY ALDRIDGE, Defendant. / ORDER This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 76). No objections were filed.1 Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that Defendant’s motion to dismiss should be denied because the complaint does not assert a state medical malpractice claim and the Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim that is asserted in the complaint is adequately pled. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 1 Plaintiff filed a “response” to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 80), but he stated in that filing that he agreed with the magistrate judge’s rulings. Case 3:24-cv-00260-TKW-ZCB Document 81 Filed 06/18/26 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 49) is DENIED. 3. This case is returned to the magistrate judge for further pretrial proceedings on the Eighth Amendment claim. DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of June, 2026. __________________________________ T. KENT WETHERELL, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 3:24-cv-00260-TKW-ZCB Document 81 Filed 06/18/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.