3:25-cv-01854•HUDSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES et al
HUDSON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES et al
3:25-cv-01854Flnd02.02.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION SELENA JANAE HUDSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:25-cv-1854-TKW-ZCB FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILES, et al., Defendants. / ORDER This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the entire case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order/preliminary injunction should be denied because she has not established a likelihood of success on the merits. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. Plaintiff’s “Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order & Preliminary Injunction” (Doc. 11) is DENIED. Case 3:25-cv-01854-TKW-ZCB Document 15 Filed 02/02/26 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 3. This case is returned to the magistrate judge for further pretrial proceedings. DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of February, 2026. __________________________________ T. KENT WETHERELL, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 3:25-cv-01854-TKW-ZCB Document 15 Filed 02/02/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.