3:25-cv-02527•SIFFORD v. VAUGHN
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION ROOSEVELT F. SIFFORD, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 3:25cv2527/LC/ZCB C. VAUGHN, Defendant. _____________________/ ORDER The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on December 12, 2025. (Doc. 4). The Court furnished the plaintiff a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice under the Court’s inherent power to manage its docket and enforce the Local Rules, based on Plaintiff’s failure to truthfully disclose his litigation history. 1 Case 3:25-cv-02527-LC-ZCB Document 5 Filed 01/20/26 Page 1 of 2
3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of January, 2026. s/L.A. Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 Case 3:25-cv-02527-LC-ZCB Document 5 Filed 01/20/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.