3:26-cv-01468•BUTKO v. WOMACK
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION JOEL BUTKO, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:26-cv-1468-TKW-ZCB DARREL M. WOMACK, Defendant. / ORDER This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (R&R) (Doc. 5). No objections were filed.1 Upon due consideration of the R&R and the case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to fully disclose his litigation history. See McNair v. Johnson, 141 F.4th 1301, 1308 (11th Cir. 2025). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1 Plaintiff may be unaware of the R&R because it and the other documents mailed to his address of record were returned by the Post Office as undeliverable and unable to forward. See Docs. 6, 7. That, however, does not preclude dismissal of this case because Plaintiff’s failure to keep the Court apprised of his current address amounts to a failure to prosecute and provides an additional reason to dismiss this case. Case 3:26-cv-01468-TKW-ZCB Document 8 Filed 03/27/26 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 1. The magistrate judge’s R&R is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice under the Court’s inherent authority based on Plaintiff’s failure to fully disclose his litigation history. 3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close the case file. DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of March, 2026. __________________________________ T. KENT WETHERELL, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 3:26-cv-01468-TKW-ZCB Document 8 Filed 03/27/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.