4:25-cv-00243•WAY v. BURCH et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION CURTIS ANTONIO WAY, DOC # 283331, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 4:25-cv-243-MCR-MAF SGT. S. BURCH and OFFICER ERIK D. HOWARD, Defendant. _________________________________/ ORDER The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation dated May 28, 2025. See ECF No. 3. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 3, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. Case 4:25-cv-00243-MCR-MAF Document 5 Filed 12/02/25 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 Case No. 4:25-cv-243-MCR-MAF 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) based on Plaintiff’s failure to demonstrate that he faces imminent danger of serious physical injury or pay the filing fee. Plaintiff may refile the action if he simultaneously submits the $405.00 filing fee. 3. The Clerk is directed to close this case file. DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of December 2025. M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 4:25-cv-00243-MCR-MAF Document 5 Filed 12/02/25 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.