ROGERS v. JUDGE OF THE US DISTICT COURT

Page 1 of 2
Case No. 4:25cv406-RH-MAF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
CURTIS ROGERS,
Plaintiff,
v. 	CASE NO. 4:25cv406-RH-MAF
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE,
Defendant.
_____________________________/
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and
recommendation, ECF No. 8, and the objections, ECF No. 9. I have reviewed the
objections de novo.
The plaintiff’s second amended complaint fails to state a claim on which
relief can be granted. Instead, it is unintelligible. One cannot know, from the
plaintiff’s filings, what he is complaining about. The objections do not address the
deficiencies noted in the report and recommendation.
Case 4:25-cv-00406-RH-MAF Document 12 Filed 12/03/25 Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2
Case No. 4:25cv406-RH-MAF
IT IS ORDERED:
The report and recommendation is accepted. The clerk must enter judgment
stating, “This case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim on which
relief can be granted.” The clerk must close the file.
SO ORDERED on December 2, 2025.
s/Robert L. Hinkle
United States District Judge
Case 4:25-cv-00406-RH-MAF Document 12 Filed 12/03/25 Page 2 of 2