5:24-cv-00137•ROSWOLD v. CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS et al
ROSWOLD v. CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS et al
5:24-cv-00137Flnd08.06.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION TYLER ROSWOLD, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 5:24-cv-137-AW-MJF CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ ORDER OF DISMISSAL Having carefully considered the matter, I now adopt the report and recommendation (ECF No. 46) and incorporate it into this order. There has been no objection. The magistrate judge concludes there are two independent reasons for dismissal: Plaintiff has not effected service, and Plaintiff has not complied with court orders. I agree that dismissal is appropriate for each of these independent reasons. As to the failure to effect service, I have independently considered whether other circumstances would justify a still further extension. See Bilal v. Geo Care, LLC, 981 F.3d 903, 919 (11th Cir. 2020). With a Plaintiff unwilling to comply with court orders or to complete service nearly two years into the case, I conclude no further extension is warranted. Case 5:24-cv-00137-AW-MJF Document 47 Filed 06/08/26 Page 1 of 2
2 The clerk will enter a judgment that says, “This case is dismissed without prejudice.” The clerk will then close the file. SO ORDERED on June 8, 2026. s/ Allen Winsor Chief United States District Judge Case 5:24-cv-00137-AW-MJF Document 47 Filed 06/08/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.