5:25-cv-00175•MARSHALL v. DIXON
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION ANTHONY C. MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. Case No. 5:25-cv-175-TKW-HTC RICKY D. DIXON, Respondent. / ORDER This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the entire case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that Respondent’s motion to dismiss should be granted because Petitioner’s §2254 habeas petition was not timely filed and equitable tolling does not apply. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 6) is GRANTED, and Petitioner’s §2254 habeas petition is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely. Case 5:25-cv-00175-TKW-HTC Document 14 Filed 02/20/26 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. 4. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close the case file. DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of February, 2026. __________________________________ T. KENT WETHERELL, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 5:25-cv-00175-TKW-HTC Document 14 Filed 02/20/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.