MCCLARTY v. FLOYD et al

5:25-cv-00314Flnd01.05.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
AURLIEAS D. MCCLARTY,
Plaintiff,
v. 	Case No. 5:25cv314-MCR/MJF
J. FLOYD, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
The magistrate judge issued a report and Recommendation dated November
14, 2025. ECF No. 5. The Court has furnished Plaintiff a copy of the Report and
Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,
United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). There have been no timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the record, the Court
concludes that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. 	The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 5, is
adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. 	This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to
comply with the Local Rules for the Northern District of Florida.
3. 	The clerk of the court will close the case file.
Case 5:25-cv-00314-MCR-MJF Document 16 Filed 05/01/26 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2
CASE NO. 5:25cv305-MCR/MJF
DONE AND ORDERED this 1 st day of May 2026.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 5:25-cv-00314-MCR-MJF Document 16 Filed 05/01/26 Page 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.