5:25-cv-00365•GUTMANN-CROWN v. GUTMANN
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION CLARICE MACHIA GUTMANN-CROWN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 5:25-cv-365-TKW-MJF STEPHEN FRANCIS GUTMANN, et al., Defendants. / ORDER This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed because the second amended complaint is a shotgun pleading. It also violates the local rules because it is not on court-mandated complaint form. See N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 5.7(A). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. Case 5:25-cv-00365-TKW-MJF Document 15 Filed 06/15/26 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 2. This case is DISMISSED because the second amended complaint is a shotgun pleading and is not on the required complaint form. 3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close the case file. DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of June, 2026. __________________________________ T. KENT WETHERELL, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 5:25-cv-00365-TKW-MJF Document 15 Filed 06/15/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.