Robertson v. Payopic LLC et al

0:25-cv-61280Flsd22.01.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 0:25-cv-61280-LEIBOWITZ/AUGUSTIN-BIRCH
COLE ROBERTSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
PAYOPIC, LLC,
et al.,
Defendants.
______________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff’s
Renewed Motion for Default Judgment [ECF No. 46] (the “R&R”), filed on January 6, 2026,
recommending that Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Default Judgment [ECF No. 44] (“the Motion”)
be GRANTED. 	[ECF No. 46 at 1, 8]. 	The undersigned previously referred the Motion to U.S.
Magistrate Judge Augustin-Birch for a report and recommendation, consistent with 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B), Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Rule 1(d) of the Local Magistrate
Judge Rules. [ECF No. 45]. No objections to the R&R were filed during the 14-day objection period.
Thus, having reviewed the Motion, the record, the Report and Recommendation, the governing law
and finding no error, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1. 	The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 46] is AFFIRMED
and ADOPTED and fully incorporated herein.
2. 	Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Default Judgment [ECF No. 44] is GRANTED.
3. 	Final Default Judgment will be entered by separate order under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 58.
4. 	Plaintiff 	is 	directed 	to 	e-mail 	a 	proposed 	Final 	Judgment 	in 	Word 	to
leibowitz@flsd.uscourts.gov no later than January 28, 2026.
Case 0:25-cv-61280-DSL Document 47 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/22/2026 Page 1 of 2
DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on January 21, 2026.
cc: 	counsel of record
Case 0:25-cv-61280-DSL Document 47 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/22/2026 Page 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.