4:25-cv-00041•BROWN v. STARLING et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION LEGENA M. BROWN, Plaintiff, vs. STANLEY KIMBLE, et al., Defendants. * * * * * CASE NO. 4:25-CV-41 (CDL) O R D E R The Court previously ordered Plaintiff to show cause why her claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Stanley Kimble, Alva Erkins, Mark Owens, Jr., and Ava Jackson-Davis should not be dismissed because she did not plausibly allege any facts suggesting that they acted under color of state law. The Court warned Plaintiff that failure to show cause would result in dismissal `of her § 1983 claims against these Defendants. Plaintiff did not respond to the Court’s show cause order. The Court finds that Plaintiff did not plausibly allege § 1983 claims against Kimble, Erkins, Owens, or Jackson-Davis. Accordingly, the Court dismisses Plaintiff’s § 1983 claims against those Defendants. The now-dismissed § 1983 claims are the only claims over which the Court had original jurisdiction. To the extent that Plaintiff attempted to assert any state law claims against Case 4:25-cv-00041-CDL-AGH Document 53 Filed 06/02/26 Page 1 of 2
2 Kimble, Erkins, Owens, and Jackson-Davis, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over those claims, which are dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of June, 2026. s/Clay D. Land CLAY D. LAND U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Case 4:25-cv-00041-CDL-AGH Document 53 Filed 06/02/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.