7:25-cv-00196•WALKER v. CLINCH COUNTY GEORGIA et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION PATRICIA WALKER, Plaintiff, v. CLINCH COUNTY, GEORGIA, and FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION, Defendants. ____________________________________ : : : : : : : : : CASE NO: 7:25-cv-196–WLS ORDER By Order (Doc. 15) entered May 4, 2026, pro se Plaintiff was ordered to file evidence on or before Monday, May 18, 2026, that Defendant Farmers Home Administration (“FHA”) had been served with a Summons and Complaint or that the FHA had waived service. Alternatively, Plaintiff was ordered to show cause by such date as to why the Complaint should not be dismissed as to the FHA for failure to serve such Defendant. Plaintiff was warned that failure to respond to or comply with that Order would subject this case to dismissal as to the FHA, without prejudice, and without further notice or proceeding. On May 11, 2026, Plaintiff had a Summons reissued to the FHA. While such action was not strictly in compliance with the Court’s May 4, 2026 Order, by Order (Doc. 17) entered May 27, 2026, the Court allowed Plaintiff an additional thirty days to fully comply with the May 4, 2026 Order. A review of the docket reflects that as of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the May 4, 2026, and May 27, 2026 Orders. There is no indication that service has been perfected as to the FHA. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) states that “[i]f a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Plaintiff has not served Defendant FHA. Nor has she shown cause why her Complaint should not be dismissed without prejudice after notice and Order from the Court. Case 7:25-cv-00196-WLS Document 18 Filed 07/08/26 Page 1 of 2
2 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Defendant Farmers Home Administration for failure to timely serve such Defendant. SO ORDERED, this 8th day of July 2026. /s/W. Louis Sands W. LOUIS SANDS, SR. JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case 7:25-cv-00196-WLS Document 18 Filed 07/08/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.