USA v. Andersen

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
VS. Hayden James Richey Anderson
Defendant.
No. 25-CR- 41
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
After consenting to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge, Defendant, together with counsel and in the presence of counsel for the Government, appeared before me to enter a guilty plea to Count(s) 4 of the
Indictment Superseding Indictment
Information.
Defendant entered a plea pursuant to a plea agreement that includes: łthe dismissal of charges, an appeal waiver, a conditional plea preserving the right to appeal certain rulings under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(a)(2), specific sentencing terms under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C).
I cautioned and examined Defendant under oath and in open court as required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, including: (1) that the Government could use Defendant's statements made under oath in a prosecution for perjury or false statement; (2) the right to plead not guilty and persist in that plea; (3) the right to counsel; (4) the right to a jury trial, to confront witnesses, to present a defense and compel witnesses, and to remain silent; (5) that trial rights would be forever waived by pleading guilty; (6) the nature of each charge to which Defendant is pleading; (7) the possible penalties that may be imposed, including the maximum and any mandatory minimum penalties and a special assessment; (8) the operation of the sentencing guidelines; and (9) all collateral consequences that could follow a conviction, including but not limited to, any applicable
AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION
Case 1:25-cr-00041-CJW-MAR
Document 57 Filed 12/23/25
Page 1 of 4
GPO

forfeiture and restitution, the absence of parole in the federal court system, the loss of citizenship rights, the nature and possible length of any term of supervised release, as well as possible immigration consequences, if applicable. Where applicable, I also made a record of any written plea agreement, the dismissal of any charges, any appeal waiver, any conditional nature of the plea, and any specific sentencing terms under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C).
Defendant was given a full opportunity to address the court and ask questions. Counsel for the Government and for Defendant were given the opportunity to make any additional record, raise issues with the validity of the plea proceeding, and assert any legal reason the plea should not be accepted. Defense counsel acknowledged that the change of plea was knowing, and voluntary, that there was a factual basis for the change of plea, and that the plea was valid.
Based on my observations and the record made, I find that: (1) Defendant is competent and the decision to plead guilty was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary and not the product of any force, pressure, threats, or promises, except as may be contained in a written plea agreement; (2) the change of plea is supported by an independent factual basis for each of the essential elements; (3) the provisions of Rule 11 and any other provisions of the law governing submission of guilty pleas have been complied with; (4) any plea agreement is in writing, was disclosed and discussed during the plea hearing, and will be filed with the Court; and (5) there are no agreements or stipulations other than those that may be contained in a written plea agreement.
2
Case 1:25-cr-00041-CJW-MAR
Document 57
Filed 12/23/25
Page 2 of 4

RECOMMENDATION
I therefore RECOMMEND that the District Court Judge ACCEPT Defendant's change of plea and adjudge Defendant guilty.
PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION
I ordered a presentence investigation be conducted by the United States Probation Office.
FORFEITURE
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(b)(1), I find that the Government has established the requisite nexus between defendant's offense and the property described in the charging document's forfeiture allegation. I recommend the District Court Judge enter a preliminary forfeiture order pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(b)(2).
RELEASE/DETENTION
Defendant was in custody at the time of the plea hearing and shall remain so pending sentencing.
Defendant shall remain released pending sentencing pursuant to the Court's prior order.
Defendant was ordered to the custody of the United States Marshals Service to be detained pending sentencing for the reasons stated on the record.
OBJECTIONS
The parties must file any objections to the findings and my recommendation no later than 14 days from the filing of this Report and Recommendation. If no objection is made, the District Court Judge may accept Defendant's guilty plea by simply entering a written order doing so.
3
Case 1:25-cr-00041-CJW-MAR
Document 57
Filed 12/23/25
Page 3 of 4

L The parties waived their rights to file objections to this Report and
Recommendation and agree that the District Court Judge may accept

Defendant’s change of plea.

DATED 1!2/23 | ><

LD, (22

MARK A. ROBERTS
United States Magistrate Judge
Northern District of lowa

4

Case 1:25-cr-00041-CJW-MAR Document57_ Filed 12/23/25 Page 4of4