1:25-cv-00015•St. Luke's Health System, LTD. v. Labrador
Gesamter Gesetzestext
O RDER - 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ST. LUKE’S HEALTH SYSTEM, LTD., Plaintiff, v. RAÚL LABRADOR, Attorney General of the State of Idaho, Defendant. Case No. 1:25-cv-00015-BLW MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER RE EXTENSION OF DEADLINES Before the Court is Plaintiff St. Luke’s Health System, Ltd.’s Second Motion for Extension of Unexpired Scheduling Order Deadlines. Defendant does not oppose the motion. See Dkt. 81. Good cause appearing, the Court will grant the unopposed motion. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Second Motion for an Extension of Unexpired Scheduling Order Deadlines (Dkt. 78) is GRANTED. 2. The deadlines set forth in this Court’s Scheduling Order at Dkt. 59 (as modified by the Order at Dkt. 69) are further modified as follows: a. Plaintiff’s expert disclosure: March 24, 2026 b. Defendant’s expert disclosure: April 23, 2026 c. Plaintiff’s rebuttal expert disclosure: May 8, 2026 d. Fact discovery cutoff: June 12, 2026 e. Expert discovery cutoff: July 10, 2026 f. Dispositive-motion deadline: July 27, 2026 Case 1:25-cv-00015-BLW Document 82 Filed 01/29/26 Page 1 of 2
O RDER - 2 3. All other provisions of the Scheduling Order at Dkt. 59 shall remain in effect. DATED: January 29, 2026 _________________________ B. Lynn Winmill U.S. District Court Judge Case 1:25-cv-00015-BLW Document 82 Filed 01/29/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.